Beware of impersonation and scams. Verify official domains before acting.
Research/Cybersecurity ETF Theme Comparison/CybersecurityData 2026-07-14
Cybersecurity ETF Theme Comparison - aeoae

Cybersecurity ETF Overview

This group currently tracks 4 ETFs, with average boundary fit 74.3% and average structure score 0.74.

Mainline ExpansionSECTOR PHASE

Cybersecurity is still one of the strongest groups, but it is already extended above L4 across many members, so read it as profit-taking and pullback management first.

Use this page as a filter, then verify single-ETF detail pages.

Participation
100.0%
Breakout Share
100.0%
Average Fit
74.3%

01Group Overview

Start with size, participation, breakout depth and current fit.
Tracked ETFs
4
Current snapshot
L3+
4
100.0%
Watch List
0
Middle structure
Defense Zone
0
0.0%

02Group Conclusion

Conclusion first, evidence second, ETF data third.
Main Trend
Mainline Expansion

Cybersecurity is still one of the strongest groups, but it is already extended above L4 across many members, so read it as profit-taking and pullback management first.

Direction
100.0%

Participation · Breakout Share 100.0% · Average Fit 74.3%

Action Bias
0.94

Start with higher-ranked ETFs, then verify boundary details.

03Peer Group Comparison

Compare adjacent groups on one scale.
GroupParticipationBreakoutTrend ScoreStructure FitStage
Cybersecurity100.0%100.0%0.9474.3%Mainline Expansion
Broad Commodities90.0%30.0%0.6075.2%Mainline Expansion
Oil & Gas / Energy92.0%29.0%0.5868.0%Mainline Expansion
Cloud / Software / Internet83.0%33.0%0.5658.9%Mainline Expansion
Utilities100.0%0.0%0.5058.3%Leader-Led
Agriculture / Water Resources60.0%60.0%0.5062.5%Mainline Expansion
Russell 100083.0%17.0%0.4958.2%Leader-Led
Financials / Banks64.0%32.0%0.4758.1%Mainline Expansion

04ETF Ranking and Selection

Answer which ETF deserves attention first.

05Theme Structure

Separate breadth, breakout, defense and fit.
Participation
100.0%
Breakout Share
100.0%
Defense
0.0%
Average Fit
74.3%
Score
94.5%

06ETF Comparison Module

Each ETF shows trend, stage, room, fit and ranking reason.
TickerNameTrendStageTarget RoomHistorical FitRankWhy Leading
BUGGlobal X Cybersecurity ETFstrong bullish structureL4+--96.2%1/4Above L4, strongest breakout confirmation
HACKAmplify Cybersecurity ETFstrong bullish structureL4+--97.8%2/4Above L4, strongest breakout confirmation
IHAKiShares Cybersecurity and Tech ETFstrong bullish structureL4+--89.4%3/4Above L4, strongest breakout confirmation
CIBRFirst Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETFstrong bullish structureL4+--95.2%4/4Above L4, strongest breakout confirmation

07ETF Lanes

Narrow the group before opening ETF details.

08What This Page Answers

Three frequent questions with direct answers.
Is Cybersecurity strong now?

Cybersecurity is currently in Mainline Expansion; participation is 100.0% and breakout share is 100.0%.

Which Cybersecurity ETF should be checked first?

Start with the first ranking card, then verify boundaries, review history and liquidity on the detail page.

What should I do next?

Open a single ETF detail page and verify Daily Review, boundary prices, holdings, liquidity and fees.

1

Read rotation first

Use the rotation radar to place this group in the broader market.

Open Rotation Radar ->
2

Then check ranking

Open the higher-ranked ETF detail first.

Open Top ETF ->
3

Cross-check peers

If the group is weak, compare peers to see where strength is moving.

Back to Research ->

09Group Distribution

Trend and boundary distribution clarify structure quickly.

Trend Distribution

100.0%
Bullish
100.0%
4

Boundary Distribution

100.0%
L4+
100.0%
4

10Difference Reading

Conclusion, evidence and boundary note.
Insight
  • Conclusion - Cybersecurity is still one of the strongest groups, but it is already extended above L4 across many members, so read it as profit-taking and pullback management first.
  • Evidence - Participation 100.0% · Breakout Share 100.0% · Average Fit 74.3%
  • Boundary - Compare leaders and laggards instead of treating the whole group as one state.

11ETF Comparison Matrix

Compare on one basis instead of reading one-day moves only.
TickerNameTrendZoneLinesStructure FitReviewScore
BUGGlobal X Cybersecurity ETFstrong bullish structureL4+496.2%0.0%0.89
HACKAmplify Cybersecurity ETFstrong bullish structureL4+497.8%0.0%0.87
IHAKiShares Cybersecurity and Tech ETFstrong bullish structureL4+489.4%0.0%0.84
CIBRFirst Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETFstrong bullish structureL4+495.2%0.0%0.79

1212-D Reading Frame

Read position, buffer and fit layers before the full table.
Position Layer
Average vs L3 3.4%

Shows whether the group is only crossing the midline or already stretched far from L3.

Buffer Layer
Average vs L1 10.6%

Shows how much buffer remains above L1, which helps separate repair from stability.

Fit Layer
Average Boundary60 30.4

Shows the average historical boundary review score, a quick read on evidence quality.

TickerNameTrendLinesZoneStructure FitReviewvs L3vs L1L4 StateSamples
BUGGlobal X Cybersecurity ETFstrong bullish structure4L4+96.2%100.0%3.5%11.1%confirmed_breakout60
HACKAmplify Cybersecurity ETFstrong bullish structure4L4+97.8%100.0%4.7%14.4%confirmed_breakout60
IHAKiShares Cybersecurity and Tech ETFstrong bullish structure4L4+89.4%100.0%2.3%7.4%confirmed_breakout60
CIBRFirst Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETFstrong bullish structure4L4+95.2%100.0%3.0%9.5%confirmed_breakout60

13Historical Review Frame

Combine phase-target replay, reach efficiency and boundary review in one table.
Current Phase
Average samples 2

Shows how many historical phase samples this group can replay against.

Phase Review
15/30D 25.0% / 50.0%

Shows how often targets were reached in shorter windows, a read on near-term efficiency.

Boundary Review
60D 100.0% · avg 26.5 days

Combines 60D reach rate and average days to target, a read on completion speed.

TickerNameReview SamplesHit RateAvg DaysL4 15DL4 30DL4 60DStabilityBoundary 20Boundary 60
BUGGlobal X Cybersecurity ETF1100.0%37.00.0%0.0%100.0%moderate28.831.1
HACKAmplify Cybersecurity ETF2100.0%18.550.0%100.0%100.0%moderate24.127.5
IHAKiShares Cybersecurity and Tech ETF2100.0%16.550.0%100.0%100.0%lower confidence32.131.7
CIBRFirst Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF1100.0%34.00.0%0.0%100.0%moderate33.131.2

14Boundary Position Table

Compare close with L2/L3/L4 and read the current boundary zone.
TickerNameCloseL2L3L4Position
BUGGlobal X Cybersecurity ETF33.4731.6232.3432.97L4+
HACKAmplify Cybersecurity ETF92.7086.3788.5290.70L4+
IHAKiShares Cybersecurity and Tech ETF54.5552.4953.3053.98L4+
CIBRFirst Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF82.1578.1979.7381.10L4+

15Research Caliber

Grouping source, comparison order and interpretation boundary.
Grouping Source

Members follow the same grouping used by the rotation radar, so this page is rebuilt as data updates.

Reading Order

Read group breadth and distribution first, then ETF lanes, boundary position and historical fit.

Interpretation Boundary

The page explains relative structure inside the group; it does not replace official disclosures or suitability checks.

Risk Note - Risk note: group strength changes quickly. Verify official disclosures, liquidity and suitability independently.